WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Xeon 5160 vs 5080

To: "Javier Guerra" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xeon 5160 vs 5080
From: "Christoph Purrucker" <cp+ml-xen@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 08:42:57 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:44:02 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <200609032111.52104.javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0609032153080.10661@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200609032111.52104.javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4
Nathan Allen Stratton wrote:

> i have no clue why newer chips doesn't have it, neither why AMD never
> bothered
> with something like that.  maybe there's some other consideration i don't
> know about.

The latter thing is quite simple: AMD threw the more transistors of their
new production process in AMD64, the 64bit extension; Intel made HT
instead.

cu cp


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>