|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?
> However, there is a fix in the later models of Opteron/Athlon64 processors
> that allows segments to be used. Intel, I think, hasn't got this feature
> (yet?)...
And 64-Bit VMWare doesn't run without it, and my Athlon64-CPU doesn't
have segmentation-support yet :-(
(And so i guess, Intel CPUs have that feature)
> So for backwards compatibility reasons and such, the 64-bit version of Xen
> uses a different method for protecting itself from being overwritten, and
> therfore negative segment references work fine.
I see. Thanks for the clarification.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Matthew Palmer
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Sven Köhler
- [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Molle Bestefich
- RE: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?,
Sven Köhler <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Re: [Xen-users] Xen and TLS, -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs needed?, Javier Guerra
|
|
|
|
|