|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] xenU / xen0 - or a single (xen) kernel?
from the README:
" These are smaller builds with just selected
modules, intended primarilly for developers that don't like to wait
for a -xen kernel to build. The -xenU kernel is particularly small
as it does not contain any physical device drivers, and hence is
only useful for guest domains."
correct me here, but does that mean for a typical rollout you want to
just build the xen kernel, and not the xenU/xen0 ??
reason I ask, is that it seems to be the standard practice to build
both, but that isnt quite what I interpret from the notes.
If anyone can point to or summarize some performance benefits for
either route, that would be great.
Thanks
--
----------------------------------
please respond to the list .. if you need to contact me direct
cgmckeever is the account
prupref.com is the domain
<A href="http://www.prupref.com">Simply Chicago Real Estate</A>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] xenU / xen0 - or a single (xen) kernel?,
Chris McKeever <=
|
|
|
|
|