WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup

To: "'John Madden'" <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Re: Re: Redundant server setup
From: "Sylvain Coutant" <sco@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 23:13:29 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 'Javier Guerra' <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 May 2006 14:14:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1148418213.26844.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: ADVISEO
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZ+q+yPPaVQTjwsSyilrTc2KqXYhQAAM0ew
> > > 7-disk RAID5
> >
[...]
> 
> This config is actually fairly typical in the SAN world.

I know. But it's usually running FC or SCSI disks with a latency twice as low 
as SATA, 2 GB of battery backed cache memory and really good RAID 5 processors. 
Even with this, performance for write ops is not very good.

BR,

--
Sylvain COUTANT

ADVISEO
http://www.adviseo.fr/
http://www.open-sp.fr/



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users