WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question

To: "Julius Spencer" <julius@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
From: "Greg Cockburn" <gergnz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:36:55 +1000
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:38:22 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NafLjlr2JmrJ8eXECCjUUc+tj+zHppHF/zoakOmg508e+0hJberE47XOZffsOTizCUyB8I6l93bNGSkPFA1nGgigpfmVdEGWmfThWVV3jYQhdrwJ3JcLYnomINhx18t1Fw+k148R9HpTV9f1Hp3pSMhdqP2ZYyjpgeWZ7Vg6x+w=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <446A8A32.9020900@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <907625E08839C4409CE5768403633E0BA7FC7C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <bd4583d00605161800u4813d081l205f415b072d45cb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <446A8A32.9020900@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That sounds like my IBM ServeRaid 7.  I don't know much about the 8, do you know what the adaptec equivalent is?  I think mine is the 2410SA, and that uses the aacraid module.

On 5/17/06, Julius Spencer <julius@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah,  unfortunately no. I think it is one of the few that isn't, from
Adaptec (my luck!). It's module name is: adpahci ; I haven't found this
anywhere except as Suse and RHEL rpms.

If you have heard of it though, do let me know. It's the Adaptec
HostRAID (IBM ServeRAID-8e) embedded in the motherboard.

From what I've read it's fakeraid, but at least it must deliver some
resources which would have been nice... Plus there's a sweet IBM
application which lets you manage and monitor the RAID (if it can find
the controller via the OS).



Greg Cockburn wrote:
> Are you sure the adaptec driver is not in the kernel.  I have adaptec to
> be very good, in terms of opening up their drives. I have not come
> across one that wasn't already in the kernel.
>
> I have used SCSI and SATA Controllers and RAID variants of each without
> getting any drivers from adaptec.
>
> Greg.
>
> On 5/17/06, *Petersson, Mats* < Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx
> <mailto:Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
>      > -----Original Message-----
>      > From: Julius Spencer [mailto:julius@xxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:julius@xxxxxxxxx>]
>      > Sent: 16 May 2006 21:23
>      > To: Petersson, Mats
>      > Cc: Sylvain Coutant; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
>      >
>      > Hi,
>      >
>      > Thanks for the reply!
>      >
>      > Essentially I have a binary driver. There are only  a few
>      > OS's which it works under. Unfortunately IBM say that they
>      > don't have much 'swing' in getting their suppliers to open
>      > source the driver and Adaptec seem to have made it impossible
>      > to make contact with them unless you have bought
>      >   from them directly.
>      >
>      > If I could patch the kernel which comes with the distro so it
>      > was "xenified" ( :) ) then perhaps I could continue to use
>      > the same driver.
>      >
>      > In this case, as it is a RAID type of device I'll have to opt
>      > to use software RAID.
>      >
>      > Thank you again for the reply.
>
>     Unfortunately in this type of situation, I'm not sure you'd get much
>     help by using an older kernel - the driver may well not behave itself
>     well enough to still work under Xen... At least, I think that is still a
>     problem in Xenified Linux as it is under HVM - drivers in Xenified
>     Linux
>     are modified to "understand" Xen, and that's not going to work with
>     binary drivers. However, I may be wrong. Someone with better
>     understanding of this may be able to correct me (or say I'm right).
>
>     --
>     Mats
>      >
>      > Petersson, Mats wrote:
>      > >
>      > >
>      > >> -----Original Message-----
>      > >> From: Sylvain Coutant [mailto:sco@xxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:sco@xxxxxxxxxx >]
>      > >> Sent: 16 May 2006 12:02
>      > >> To: Petersson, Mats; 'Julius Spencer';
>      > xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      > >> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
>      > >>
>      > >>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to patch an older kernel (eg.
>      > >>>> 2.6.9) so it can be compiled to run as a Xen kernel (dom0)?
>      > >>> Now, my question is: Why would you want that?
>      > >> ie, just because one have some other patches to apply against the
>      > >> kernel. It can sometimes be a true nightmare to set up a full
>      > >> dom0+domU which includes every tool one need :-(
>      > >
>      > > Ok, fair enough. You'd just have to look at which patches are the
>      > > biggest - and I think Xen is quite intrusive, so unless your other
>      > > patches are also touching a lot of files in the kernel, I would
>      > > suspect that porting the other patches would be easier...
>      > >
>      > > --
>      > > Mats
>      > >> --
>      > >> Sylvain
>      > >>
>      > >>
>      > >>
>      > >>
>      > >
>      > >
>      > > _______________________________________________
>      > > Xen-users mailing list
>      > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>      > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>      > >
>      >
>      >
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Xen-users mailing list
>     Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>