| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] OT:Samba For Shared Storage
I agree, even after all the hackery, throughput on the LinkSys device is very slow. I had used the NSLU2 in my home network for over a year, but the limited throughput became a serious bottleneck when I began storing files larger than 10MB (Oggs, MPEGs etc.) in size... I ended up eBay-ing the thing, and replaced it with a Shuttle Box (in my case a cheapo SK43G, Sempron 2400+, 512MB RAM, a LinkSys GigE network card, and a DVD-ROM, no internal hard drive), booted up using a modified version of a live distro called Slax (see
http://www.slax.org), and external SATA drives (shared using SAMBA for Windows access). So far, this has worked like a charm..
-Ovais
On 4/25/06,
Goetz Bock <bock@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 25 '06 at 23:47, Javier Guerra wrote:
> > in one location. Price is an issue at this point and we cant afford a
> > large SAN, what we were thinking is getting a NAS device like the
> > linksys NSLU2 NAS storage device, this exports via samba.
>
> just go [ ... ] to make it run whatever server you want. at least check:
> [e.g.] to serve NFS and AoE respectively
I still can't belive you're serios. The NSLU2 (even when overclocked)
can only server like 5MB/s. Any 300$ PC can do better. It needs more
power but you can run any OS you want.
(Still unslugh is fabulouse).
--
/"\ Goetz Bock at blacknet dot de -- secure mobile Linux everNETting
\ / (c) 2006 Creative Commons, Attribution-ShareAlike
2.0 de
X [ 1. Use descriptive subjects - 2. Edit a reply for brevity - ]
/ \ [ 3. Reply to the list - 4. Read the archive *before* you post ]
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home