 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: an attempt to explain xen networking
| To: | "Dirk H. Schulz" <dirk.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Re: an attempt to explain xen networking |
| From: | Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:50:37 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 03 Feb 2006 13:02:09 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=m05n7TBWkUBvrS+aJ+oWw27/oOqA74NowIuVAZiA8OXGsLwJ7x1kL1aRnoCW19y24/pn89pwJGJcSWVpNdMWpHHO8ZLNJKFoOvxbLJqRg6zVTqx4dPB/fyacQ4orIh/idJTMpqlk0LzvhuniOphxbkvm0W9cHY/81Qe4u7jGF1o= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <43E34EF4.9000404@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <1138805838.9441.79.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43E33CBD.9080609@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060203122904.GB11606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <43E34EF4.9000404@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Dirk H. Schulz wrote: > It is good to have the physical interface and the dom0 interface > separated; thus you can e.g. setup a firewall on dom0 that does not > affect the traffic to the domUs (just for protecting dom0 alone). Oh.. In that case, why is it _not_ good to have a separate physical and dom0 virtual interface when you're doing routed setups? Per Patrick's images, there are no peth0 etc. when using the routed setup vs. the bridging solution. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0.0 32bit-pae (testing changeset 8270) crashes(pgtable.c:284, kernel bug?), Petersson, Mats |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] 'Link veth0 is missing' - caused by having no 'ip' command, CJ van den Berg |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] an attempt to explain xen networking, Dirk H. Schulz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] an attempt to explain xen networking, Sanjay Upadhyay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
