Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI

[Alvin Starr <alvin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Per Andreas Buer wrote:

> Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
>
> > well, my idea of HA is as follows:
> >  - Two storage servers on individual SANs connected to the Xen hosts. 
> > Each storage server provides block devices per iscsi.
> >   
> I guess gnbd can be a drop-in replacement for iSCSI. I would think 
> performance is better as gnbd is written for the Linux kernel -  the 
> SCSI protocol is written for hardware. I _know_ gnbd is easier to set 
> up. You just point the client to the server and the client populates 
> /dev/gnbd/ with the named entries (the devices are given logical names 
> - no SCSI buses, devices or LUNS).
If I remember correctly gnbd is not quite the same as iscsi. When I 
looked into using gnbd I figured I could not create a target disk device 
that would present 10-20 unique devices to the xen clients.
I am using lvm to break apart a set of disks and then presenting each 
volume as a separate iscsi target.
I did not think the same thing could be done with GNBD but then I 
started this about a year ago so the rules may have changed in the 
interfening time.
> If we compare your iSCSI-based setup to a setup with 
> Heartbeat/DRBD/GNBD-setup there might be some interesting points. You 
> can choose for yourself if you want the DomUs to act as GNBD clients 
> or if you want to access the GNBD servers directly from your DomU - or 
> a combination (through Dom0 for rootfs/swap - and via GNBD for data 
> volumes).
> >  - On domU two iscsi block devices are combined to a raid1. On this 
> > raid1 we will have the rootfs.
> > Advantages:
> >  - storage servers can easily upgraded. Because of raid1 you can 
> > savely disconnect on storage server and upgrade hard disk space. 
> > After resync the raid1 you can do the same with the other storage 
> > server.
> >   
> The same with Heartbeat/DRBD/GNBD. You just fail one of the storage 
> servers and upgrade it. After it is back up DRBD does an _incremental_ 
> sync witch usually just takes a few seconds. With such a setup you can 
> use a _dedicated_ link for DRBD.
That is a nice feature.

> >  - If you use a kind of lvm on the storage servers you can easily 
> > expand the exportet iscsi block devices (the raid1 and the filesystem 
> > has also to be expanded).
> >   
> The same goes for Hearbeat/DRBD/GNBD I would guess.
>
> >  - You can make live migration without configuring the destination 
> > Xen host specially (e.g. provide block devices in dom0 to export to 
> > domU) because all is done in domU.
> >   
> GNBD clients are more or less stateless.
>
> >  - If one domU dies or the Xen host you can easily start the domUs on 
> > other Xen hosts.
> > Disadvantages:
> >  - When one storage server dies ALL domU have to rebuild their raid1 
> > when storage this storage server comes back. High traffic on the SANs.
> You will also have to rebuild a volume if a XenU dies while writing to 
> disk.
> >  - Not easy to setup a new domU in this environment (lvm, iscsi, raid1)
> >   
> iSCSI for rootfs sounds lke a lot of pain.
>
> > Not sure:
> >  - Performance? Can we get full network performance in domU? Ideal is 
> > we can use full bandwith of the SANs (e.g. 1GBit/s). And if the SANs 
> > can handle this (i will make raid0 with three SATA disks in each 
> > storage server).
> >   
> Remember that every write has to be written twice. So your write 
> capacity might suffer a bit.
Has anybody built a system using gnbd that supports several dom0 systms 
and migrating domU's?
--
Alvin Starr                   ||   voice: (416)585-9971
Interlink Connectivity        ||   fax:   (416)585-9974
alvin@xxxxxxxxxx              ||


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users