WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] setting up private networking between dom0 and domU?

To: Xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] setting up private networking between dom0 and domU?
From: Fernando Maior <fernando.souto.maior@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:52:36 -0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:04:32 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HoZ9WcQ6mCMFeN4lN5S1YcvtODBicDacg0fiDe5coV4hCbBakB+dok7DKYQVycpj1p0BtajWwu19TOMpfzbi662MWH8Yags0KrOkVzzhaJgoXsSjKSIAkmoYV/A8YIMjMlzQ12omkc6UmrLbeYhIORak9pPgNo1PwXtu26LPXng=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4acab3b40601221737tc0d215cu5a094468133a5daf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4acab3b40601221737tc0d215cu5a094468133a5daf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 1/22/06, Jack Snodgrass <mylinuxguy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am trying to set up dom0 <->domU networking using a
> virtual switch, a tap device on dom0 and a NIC on domU.
>
> I have domU <-> domU connectvity throguth a virtual switch.
> I also have domU <-> eth0 using a bridge. I'm using Xen 3.0
> from Fedora FC5.
>
> I used these commands to set up the tap0 and sw2 device:
>
>   # creating switch 2
>   brctl addbr sw2
>   brctl stp sw2 off
>   brctl setfd sw2 0
>   ifconfig sw2 up
>
>  # creating tun/tap device
>  tunctl -t tap0
>
> # adding tun/tap device to bridge
> brctl addif sw2 tap0
>
> # configuring tap0 device
> ip address add 192.168.3.2/29 dev tap0
> ifconfig tap0 up
>
> ifconfig shows:
> [root@xen xen]# ifconfig sw2
> sw2       Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr A6:44:26:ED:AC:5F
>           inet6 addr: fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:259 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>           RX bytes:7252 (7.0 KiB)  TX bytes:468 (468.0 b)
>
> [root@xen xen]# ifconfig tap0
> tap0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr A6:44:26:ED:AC:5F
>           inet addr:192.168.3.2  Bcast:192.168.3.7  Mask:255.255.255.248
>           inet6 addr: fe80::a444:26ff:feed:ac5f/64 Scope:Link
>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:687 overruns:0 carrier:0
>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
> (NOTE: look at the dropped:687 packets for tap0. I don't know what that 
> means...
> other than its bad.  )
>
> If I to a tcpdump -n -i sw2, and ping the tap0 device from my domU
> instance, I see:
> [root@xen xen]# tcpdump  -n  -i sw2
> tcpdump: WARNING: sw2: no IPv4 address assigned
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on sw2, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes
> 21:24:15.428994 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
> 21:24:16.427484 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
> 21:24:17.427558 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
> 21:24:18.439598 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
> 21:24:19.439673 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
> 21:24:20.439724 arp who-has 192.168.3.2 tell 192.168.3.1
>
> the dom0 device does not answere the ARP Who-Has request. The domU box
> has the correct netmask and broadcast address defined.
>
> I set up sw1 in a similar fashion as sw2. My two domU machine are able
> to talk over sw1 just fine.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> Thanks - jack
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>

Hi,
Did you realize you have same MAC address for both sw2 and
tap0? What about your eth0? May be you have a conflict up
there...

--
Bye,
Fernando Maior
LPIC/1(31908)
LinuxCounter(391325)

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>