| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] xen 3.0 testing ACPI problems / no PCI functionality
> First of all .. as I said ACPI was the reason why my mashine
> was constantly rebooting as - if ACPI enabled - xen does did
> not detect the amount of RAM properly and thus is always
> claiming it wasnt enough.
> Sencondly, the xen kernel config is not that much different
> to mine ..
> my kernel is just more lightweight tho.
> ...
> ACPI isnt the main problem, could you please also refer to
> the second problem, which is of much more importance to me?
Can you not just put 'acpi=off' on the *xen* command line (not the linux
one)?
Please try this with the -xen kernel.
Ian
> best regards,
> Patrick
>
> Ian Pratt wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >>I just encountered that the xen 3.0 testing (from the mercurial
> >>repository) will not work if I have ACPI compiled into the kernel.
> >>Although the kernel will build properly, I cant boot it, as xen is
> >>constantly moaning about the amount of memory reservated
> for dom0 and
> >>thus is rebooting again and again (the appropiate settings
> are given
> >>and correct).
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Any reason not to be using our -xen kernel config? It has
> ACPI and sems
> >to work fine for the almost everyone.
> >
> >Ian
> >
> >
> >
> >>I confirmed this by NOT compiling ACPI into my kernel at
> all .. then
> >>xen boots up fine... BUT then I do not have PCI
> functionality at all
> >>(which means lspci is empty and all my PCI devices do not
> work, even
> >>not if I try to load the appropiate driver manually). Again the
> >>settings (config) are compiled in and correctly set (which simply
> >>means I wasnt a jerk and forgot compiling PCI support in tho).
> >>I am using sis5513 as mainboard chipset and another
> confirmation on my
> >>side, as far as the problerm above's concerned, is that I tried
> >>exactly the same kernel config (without the xen config symbols of
> >>course) and compiled a vanilla 2.6.12.6 kernel manually ..
> it boots up
> >>fine and PCI support is also given, while doing the same with a
> >>xen-patched kernel will not work at all and results in pci
> >>non-functionality.
> >>
> >>Any further confirmation about the two problems I mentioned above
> >>would be appreciated.
> >>
> >>
> >>best regards,
> >>Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Xen-users mailing list
> >>Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home