 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0
| To: | Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0 |
| From: | David H <davidh.davidh@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:06:15 -0800 |
| Cc: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:11:55 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HeuLafEMHgX56QBk2xm3TlPKDjwF6a9b21kb+WIFMzrUE+aINlFKO8/YkDG4YUy68YFK8Jlguhq4SOs0/oqfTqyqx6HGFrYdVAhzfKzswkDuMvd4HDhleZnzXwjiUhrVzlu2tBYuGvhdRDwJe5b3q+zdxH0ybBjXnYlBWuGr4Ec= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <62b0912f0601051123mb2c91bar3410e180f82a1537@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D409EED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <62b0912f0601051123mb2c91bar3410e180f82a1537@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 1/5/06, Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ian Pratt wrote: > > I know everyone always ignores me whenever I say this, but users really > > should be using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U. > > Humn, maybe it's just me that's not ignoring you. But the names xen > vs. xen0/U does not infer any obvious difference and I've never seen > the difference documented anywhere (although it probably is, who > knows). > > > The latter two are > > just to make build times quicker for developers. The -xen kernel has way > > more drivers, though built as modules, so you'll need to make an initrd. > > Maybe renaming them -xendevel0 and -xendevelU or some such would help? > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > Now documented at the following location. http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/InstallationNotes#head-64f7b0db4fee44809a97a827e92fa9ed27a732a8 David _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [Xen-users] Confused about the xen livecd 3.0, Ian Pratt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] xen3.0 and suse10.0 fstab, Karsten M. Self |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0, Molle Bestefich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Poor hard disk performance on xen-3/dom0, Fraser Campbell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
