|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Xen 3: Functional NAT Possible?
Hi,
I have been trying for days now to get a working nat setup with my
domU's using the default nat scripts.
I find the biggest problem being that each time a new domU is started,
it gets thrown on a separate subnet.
Here is an example of dom0's network setup with 2 vm's started:
vif1.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
inet addr:10.0.1.128 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:8601 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:8932 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:1997282 (1.9 MiB) TX bytes:2003904 (1.9 MiB)
vif9.0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF
inet addr:10.0.9.128 Bcast:0.0.0.0 Mask:255.255.255.255
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:684 (684.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
domU-1 :
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:22:22:22:01
inet addr:10.0.1.1 Bcast:10.0.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
domU-2 (default)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:22:22:22:02
inet addr:10.0.9.1 Bcast:10.0.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
domU-2 (via dhcp)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:22:22:22:02
inet addr:10.0.1.1 Bcast:10.0.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0
my dhcpd conf:
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 {
range 10.0.1.10 10.0.1.100;
option routers 10.0.1.128;
option ip-forwarding off;
option broadcast-address 10.0.255.255;
option subnet-mask 255.255.0.0;
option domain-name-servers 10.0.1.128;
host mailserver {
hardware ethernet 00:50:22:22:22:01;
fixed-address 10.0.1.1;
}
host webserver {
hardware ethernet 00:50:22:22:22:02;
fixed-address 10.0.1.2;
}
}
The problem is, no matter what i do, the interface for the domU on my
dom0 gets ips in different subnets, therefore they can't talk to each
other and each domU requires a different gateway.. is there any way
around this, it is getting very frustrating.
Thanks,
Jeff
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen 3: Functional NAT Possible?,
Jeff Utter <=
|
|
|
|
|