 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit us
| To: | "Petersson, Mats" <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit userland? |
| From: | Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:47:44 +1300 |
| Cc: | xen ml <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:45:23 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qwYOG8+tgDL8hSrz/PUanw+4iCWn2EmfwTzB7iIgVyJTqDR+Mjb12DCg4ElsNMSoUFBqLcCDApsDNEnoS2EcDtKaR6dY2/QLLHtLFiLC89LZyRkcvHC9ALWFZ1EyhcGJoMuUATULvEKNim41aDlKecsA/89Wu5ZpaYAKB3jgp8w= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C3077285E500D5118C7300508BB3D9170C10BDB3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <C3077285E500D5118C7300508BB3D9170C10BDB3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | Nicholas Lee <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
On 10/5/05, Petersson, Mats <mats.petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote: > at the moment, Virtualization hardware isn't publicly available from > either AMD or Intel. I don't know what timescales this will be made > available... Going to require a whole new hardware set as well, plus the burn in time while its tested before it becomes useful in production. Being able to mix 32 and 64 userlands is probably just as useful at the moment. Means I can run a well test solid 32bit userland dom0, and do all the flaky 64bit userland testing in reusable domUs. -- Nicholas Lee http://stateless.geek.nz gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF 5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit userland?, Mark Williamson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit userland?, Nicholas Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-users] Xen 3.0 - dom0 with 32bit userland vs domU with 64bit userland?, Petersson, Mats |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-users] CPU Utilization., Preethi M |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
