| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
On Sat, 2005-09-24 at 12:22 -0400, Mike Kowalchik wrote:
> At least superficially all materials there are talking about xen 2.0
> (or alternatively 2.0.7) and not 3.0. I've seen people mention 3.0,
> and that it's in testing. I guess the source tarballs for 2.0 testing
> are really for 3.0? I guess it's not very clear (to me at least)
> where 3.0 is. Most of what comes up from a search for 3.0 is some ppt
> slides on architecture, roadmap, and some messages regarding a
> release schedule.
>
> -MikeK
>
>
> On Sep 24, 2005, at 12:01 PM, DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre wrote:
>
> > did you search on http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/ ?
> >
> > where else any one would ?
> >
> > --
> > DEMAINE Benoit-Pierre (aka DoubleHP ) http://www.demaine.info/
> > \_o< If computing were an exact science, IT engineers would not
> > have work >o_/
> >
I suggest you follow the mercurial cheatsheet.
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/readmes/hg-cheatsheet.txt
This is an absolute joy to use and lightning fast.
Follow the README instructions, and most definitely check the kernel
configs before you spin them.
Also more of us are lurking in ##xen on freenode all the time.
The latest source is very usable and perfomance on my domU's is
excellent. I have 2 very fat domU's and 5 light ones on an SMP Athlon
running unstable.
Regards,
Ted
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home