WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

RE: [Xen-users] Live migration problem

To: "Steven Hand" <Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Live migration problem
From: "Cole, Ray" <Ray_Cole@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:04:42 -0500
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:02:51 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWpDai6SqD29VhtRVaUse4xGUd/MAAfhBzwAACzjQA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Live migration problem
Same thing happens when I have a process running that is not NFS-intensive.

Is there some additional debugging information I can enable to provide more 
information?

-- Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Cole, Ray 
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 10:48 AM
To: 'Steven Hand'
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Live migration problem


I intsalled 2.0-testing.  The 2.6.12-xen0/U kernel in 2.0-testing that I pulled 
this morning seems to panic right up front so I went back to the 
2.6.11.12-xen0/U kernel.

This combination still causes the suspend to fail with the same 'Retry suspend 
domain' calls.

What I'm running in the domain will be doing a ton of NFS access (doing a build 
that uses all networked resources).  Not sure if that would come into play or 
not.  I'll try making it do something else that will be less NFS intensive to 
see if that works better or not.

-- Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Hand [mailto:Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 7:41 PM
To: Cole, Ray
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Live migration problem

The latter - although there was a bug earlier whereby even though the
message (a 'xfr_vm_suspend' message to xend) was correctly delivered,
it could get ignored by xend. This is fixed in 2.0-testing; the patch
is small though and so you could just try it on a 2.0 tree if you don't 
want to upgrade your kernels. 

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users