WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI Initiator anyone?

To: Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI Initiator anyone?
From: "Gino LV. Ledesma" <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 22:26:20 -0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:25:17 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=prfTfbM9cYoaSYcCnKipe0y3RQZWKK8WjKGX3tARIGRynnFfj1jLR/5uWdom19h/XUeVSIN/QOxkhAJLsOQ2tEYSNtog+K0QsmDHbXbKgrwfwyqv6/XX9ugpJ6tpw9+nEuENP4FyZEvfsb49JlGW8IxopZhgeSj8Nu92geexVU4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <e27bf77705062622244ff9d281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <e27bf77705061318051389d345@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <b1fa2917050626215010aee450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <e27bf77705062622244ff9d281@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Gino LV. Ledesma" <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oh, on another note, I'm curious as to how you've used iSCSI with Xen
(e.g. stability, scalability, performance). I ran the usual bonnie++
benchmarks to get I/O throughput, but from informal testing I get
slightly much better performance with NFS. And on reliability, it
seems that Linux is much better at handling NFS servers going away
rather than iSCSI Targets going away...

- gino

On 6/26/05, Gino LV. Ledesma <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still remember which changes you made? I'm still in the process of
> doing the tweaks myself to compile properly. I've gotten unh_iscsi to
> work and it seems to be pretty ok, though I still haven't gotten the
> hang of getting multiple LUNs from one target -- linux-iscsi's
> iscsiadm --sendtargets makes that part easy.
> 
> - gino
> 
> 
> On 6/26/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > linux-iscsi worked fine for me. It required some tweaking to compile
> > against 2.6.11
> >
> > On 6/13/05, Gino LV. Ledesma <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi, list
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried out a SCSI Initiator with Xen? I'm currently looking
> > > at linux-iscsi[1] and open-scsi[2]. So far, linux-iscsi 4.0.x fails on
> > > compile and linux-iscsi 5.0.x (same codebase as open-scsi) does a
> > > kernel stack trace upon initiating a session with an iSCSI Target,
> > > regardless if it's done in dom-0 or dom-U.
> > >
> > > Looking at the xen-devel list some recent posts have the same inquiry,
> > > but no answers yet. :-)
> > >
> > > - gino
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > >
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>