WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / relatedtonetw

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / relatedtonetwork interface
From: Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 01:34:21 +0000
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 May 2005 01:33:38 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D281F68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Openpgp: id=BF15490B; url=http://strugglers.net/~andy/pubkey.asc
References: <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D281F68@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 02:08:46AM +0100, Ian Pratt wrote:
> It would be very helpful if you could try and work out which UDP
> application is triggering this, so we can try and create a simple recipe
> to reproduce the issue.

Every ping from dom0 to a domU will produce it:

$ ping strugglers.net
PING strugglers.net (212.13.198.70) 56(84) bytes of data.
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:36 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:37 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.093 ms
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.085 ms
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.092 ms
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:38 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.084 ms
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:39 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.085 ms
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:40 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.088 ms
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at 
kernel/softirq.c:140
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [local_bh_enable+130/144] 
local_bh_enable+0x82/0x90
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [skb_checksum+317/704] skb_checksum+0x13d/0x2c0
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [udp_poll+154/352] udp_poll+0x9a/0x160
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [sock_poll+41/64] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [do_pollfd+149/160] do_pollfd+0x95/0xa0
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [do_poll+106/208] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [sys_poll+353/576] sys_poll+0x161/0x240
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [sys_gettimeofday+60/144] 
sys_gettimeofday+0x3c/0x90
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [__pollwait+0/208] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
May 30 01:29:41 curacao kernel:  [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
64 bytes from strugglers.net (212.13.198.70): icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.082 ms

I'm pretty sure it's the ping that's triggering it there because if
I don't do anything then it can be several minutes between
occurences, but when I ping I get one occurence for every ping.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>