WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-research

[Xen-research] Re: Xen-research Digest, Vol 16, Issue 3

To: xen-research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-research] Re: Xen-research Digest, Vol 16, Issue 3
From: Wesley Emeneker <wesley.emeneker@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 00:18:41 -0600
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:18:41 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-hashcash:x-stampprotocols:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XGbBkWDrgTLhAjINkO9IK3U2IzwskxOMFFbmtexCFy4=; b=aCJpe46fBpfrASv3jK5qDsmDC4iMNmtcItdQOw8Fromwzdt/J3ZH6xi60tBKNO5Gfi h2dZbWvbcmbLQTUGG4eoA6jJhrHhoS2Ht6widQRAa8lCCpmQ+4F4JYAqWGfKmWh5TZ92 M3xVJ+rCFsGhwSEZCFbpMd5WiorQlF9ULuT0E=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-hashcash:x-stampprotocols:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hgepB8rVtUVNinJ7qlkHqdhR1eMKRSoDab+Xh1t0Mq2hQcTh/vIyVa8DXBYhBmR4qb 1Pg+bBIvyis0SLFJlhO7Sc4Sw0zKkiISTJGpr0f7dB2hIqkfRUgIVRdi0GfeGqhsohPP aV+ojY29PnwHo88r0NV0pTYlXTSbeYPjuqPpo=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4b7eeec7.2a1bf30a.2edc.ffffcdfdSMTPIN_ADDED@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-research-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Research Issues on Xen <xen-research.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-research@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-research>, <mailto:xen-research-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-research>, <mailto:xen-research-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4b7eeec7.2a1bf30a.2edc.ffffcdfdSMTPIN_ADDED@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-research-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
Quickly instantiating multiple VMs from the same base image is something
I don't work on.
A previous email mentioned Snowflock, which is designed to do a fast
instantiation of nearly identical VMs.

You might also look at OpenNebula, OSCAR-V, Ganeti, or any one of the
other VM creation tools.

If you have 100 different VM images that you want to bring up at the
same time, Xen infrastructure/developments won't really help you as it
is a problem they aren't really worried about.
Your best bet is to look at one of the higher layers (Snowflock, ...).

Hopefully I didn't miss the question you were asking.


Wesley


> 
> What about this use-case?
> 
> We have a supercomputer with 200,000 cores. And it is devoted to
> Infrastructure-as-a-Service cloud computing model. So this means it
> must be able to bring up different Virtual Machines lets say 100
> different Virtual Machine (depends on the workload) at the same time.
> We assume that supercomputer has Parallel File System to read Virtual
> Machine files concurrently by high speed.
> What sort of developments need to be done in Xen to manage this situation?
> 
> Regards,
> Mehdi
> 
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Wesley Emeneker
> <wesley.emeneker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I've been researching (and measuring) this on x86_64 for about a year now.
>> I've been focusing on how cache structures affect the performance of a
>> range of scientific applications with various levels of VCPU-pinning.
>>
>> Some of the questions are:
>> 1. How much do the applications like/hate sharing a last level cache
>> (usually L2 or L3 depending on what the micro-architecture is)?
>> 2. Do TLBs have much of an effect?
>> 3. Depending on the answer to question 1, how well can applications
>> share a cache? i.e. if we have a CPU-intensive, small-memory application
>> how well does it share with a memory-hungry app?
>>
>>
>> What I've found is that a good many scientific applications actually
>> like sharing a cache.
>> If they don't share one, performance often suffers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Wesley Emeneker
>>
>>
>>> If we consider the future of computer systems with many cores, the
>>> problem of bringing multiple VMs at the same time on a multicore
>>> system becomes critical from the performance and speed point of view.
>>> I'd like to know whether is there any research on this topic?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mehdi
>> ***
>> This email has been stamped using Penny Post. Stamping email helps
>> combat spam.
>> Find out more about stamping your email at: http://pennypost.sourceforge.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-research mailing list
>> Xen-research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-research
>>
> 
> 
> 


***
This email has been stamped using Penny Post. Stamping email helps
combat spam.
Find out more about stamping your email at: http://pennypost.sourceforge.net

_______________________________________________
Xen-research mailing list
Xen-research@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-research

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-research] Re: Xen-research Digest, Vol 16, Issue 3, Wesley Emeneker <=