Re: [XenPPC] Should the platform name be "Xen-Maple"

[Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This comes from the fact that we are running xen from an underlying  
host platform.
for example, if you boot linux without xen but on SLOF your machine  
name is "Maple".
see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/xen/setup.c define_machine 246  
define_machine(xen)
I'd be interested in changing this to "Xen" for DomUs, but Dom0  
should reflect the underlying machine type that linux would use  
without Xen.
-JX


On Feb 27, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Jerone Young wrote:

> In /proc/cpuinfo of a domain0 you see the following:
>
>  processor       : 0
>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
>  processor       : 1
>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
>  processor       : 2
>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
>  processor       : 3
>  cpu             : PPC970MP, altivec supported
>  clock           : 2300.000000MHz
>  revision        : 1.1 (pvr 0044 0101)
>  timebase        : 14318378
>  platform        : Xen-Maple
>
> The "platform" line "Xen-Maple" is currently used by some tools in
> distros to identify the platform of the machine. The question I  
> pose is
> should this be changed from "Xen-Maple" since running on Xen does not
> mean you are running on Maple.
>
> Something like "Xen" would probably be better. What do you guys  
> think ?
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
> Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel