Hi Mark, you didn't mention this but I understand you are loading your
dom0 in an unusual way. Does this patch solve your problem?
diff -r ed5ee9dde0bd xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c
--- a/xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c Sun Jan 21 08:17:46 2007 -0500
+++ b/xen/arch/powerpc/boot_of.c Mon Jan 22 16:14:28 2007 -0600
@@ -488,6 +488,23 @@ static void boot_of_free(ulong addr, ulo
}
#endif
+static void boot_of_reserve(ulong addr, ulong size)
+{
+ ulong bits;
+ ulong pos;
+ ulong i;
+
+ size = ALIGN_UP(size, PAGE_SIZE);
+ bits = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ pos = addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < bits; i++) {
+ if (test_bit(pos + i, mem_available_pages))
+ of_panic("%s: pg :0x%lx already reserved.\n", __func__, pos + i);
+ set_bit(pos + i, mem_available_pages);
+ }
+}
+
static ulong boot_of_alloc(ulong size)
{
ulong bits;
@@ -1121,6 +1138,7 @@ static void * __init boot_of_module(ulon
/* was it handed to us in registers ? */
mod0_start = r3;
mod0_size = r4;
+ boot_of_reserve(r3, r4);
of_printf("%s: Dom0 was loaded and found using r3/r4:"
"0x%lx[size 0x%lx]\n",
__func__, mod0_start, mod0_size);
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 15:31 -0500, Mark F Mergen wrote:
>
> I cannot replicate Stuart's successful report. I'm sure my simulator
> is a much older build than his and Hollis' guess about device trees is
> another reason I should bring my simulator up to date. I apologize
> for raising a problem without doing that first. I might not get to it
> right away, but I will do it. Hollis, why don't you not waste your
> time with simulator until I test with a current one.
>
> Mark
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
|
Home