WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update block tests

To: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Update block tests to use xvd rather than SCSI or IDE
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:53:28 +0000
Cc: Xen-Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XenPPC-Devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:31:57 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <patchbomb.1162186738@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1162186738@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:38:58PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:

> Hello All,
>       This patch Updates all the block specific tests in xm-test to
> use the Xen Virtual Block Devices rather than overriding the SCSI or
> IDE subsystems.  It also cleans up some whitespace problems (Which
> looking back I should have done in a separate patchset).
> 
> The last patch (3/3) bumps the version number of xm-test to 1.1, as
> these new block tests will certainly fail with older initrd's due to the
> lack of xvd device nodes in the initrd.
> 
> I've tested these patches with no regressions on x86, and a number of
> improvements on PPC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Series applied, thanks Tony.  It's queuing up behind a big change, but its on
the way once our tests have passed.

Ewan.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel