WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

Re: [XenPPC] Error creating domain on JS20 (Fw: [Prose-jvm] Brief Status

To: xen-ppc-devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XenPPC] Error creating domain on JS20 (Fw: [Prose-jvm] Brief Status in TRL (2006/08/24))
From: Maria Butrico <butrico@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:18:49 -0400
Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:20:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <8919B6FD-7D6F-4076-A38E-1EDFAD897048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <OF4FF9241B.00E00F30-ON852571D4.004E5AE6-852571D4.0050CDFA@xxxxxxxxxx> <1643DDC9-3E91-4A66-B538-757988067127@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8919B6FD-7D6F-4076-A38E-1EDFAD897048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: butrico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
I have the latest SLOF (6331)

kpblade4:/proc/device-tree/cpus # ls
#address-cells  linux,phandle  name  PowerPC,970@0  #size-cells  smp-enabled

I also probably have a old blade. But your statement is correct:
"Almost all JS20".  However, that is not the same as all the JS20.

Segher Boessenkool wrote:
The directory does not exist in my dom0 Linux, but "PowerPC,970FX@0" exists
instead.  Maybe, my JS20 is newer than Watson's, and uses different CPU
(970FX).  Today, I have no time to debug this further.  Any solution?

You have a newer SLOF version, only the ancient version uses
plain "970" for everything.  Almost all JS20's actually are 970FX.

we have 970, 970FX, 970MP, 970PG and there may be others :)

970, 970FX, 970GX, 970MP, actually.

can we glob this in the python?

Shouldn't be any reason to glob for 970, even -- all device nodes
below /cpus are cpus, always.


Segher


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel