|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ppc-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [XENBUS] Avoid direct use of xen_start_i
This is great, because on PowerPC we're looking to drop struct
start_info entirely. However, I notice there are still a fair number of
'xen_start_info' references in drivers/xen. Are there more of these
patches coming Steven, or since HVM guests don't use those drivers
you're not pursuing them?
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 19:20 +0000, Xen patchbot-unstable wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User kfraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> # Node ID e061f14161b052b3287a1e41222cfa292a194fc2
> # Parent 9519445d9e9d7b8bd48fcd93d1bba485508ddbff
> [XENBUS] Avoid direct use of xen_start_info. It's unevailable when
> building as a separate driver for an HVM guest.
> Signed-off-by: Steven Smith <ssmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> @@ -1014,8 +1017,13 @@ static int __init xenbus_probe_init(void
> if (xsd_port_intf)
> xsd_port_intf->read_proc = xsd_port_read;
> #endif
> - } else
> + } else {
> xenstored_ready = 1;
> + xen_store_evtchn = xen_start_info->store_evtchn;
> + xen_store_mfn = xen_start_info->store_mfn;
> + }
> +
> + xen_store_interface = mfn_to_virt(xen_store_mfn);
>
> /* Initialize the interface to xenstore. */
> err = xs_init();
Could we abstract this part more please? I think calling into an
arch-provided xen_get_store_mfn() function would be good. (And of course
the same for store_evtchn and the console_* equivalents.)
--
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-changelog] [XENBUS] Avoid direct use of xen_start_info.,
Hollis Blanchard <=
|
|
|
|
|