WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] [3/3] dom0_ops explicitly sized types

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] [3/3] dom0_ops explicitly sized types
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:37:27 -0500
Cc: John Levon <levon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:36:48 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1148660853.24768.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center
References: <1148509900.26460.22.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148511175.26460.35.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148511400.26460.39.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148511874.26460.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060525153957.GO6710@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148583731.15517.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20060526133221.GA5569@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148653733.24768.49.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148657437.26643.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1148660853.24768.97.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:27 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> 
> Anyway, regardless of any opinion expressed here the Linux gatekeepers
> will no doubt insist on __uN. We might as well do it now as change it
> later.

And where will userspace, e.g. tools/libxc/xc_linux.c, find the
definition of __u64?

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel