[Xen-devel] Re: Resend: xenolinux hg repo

["Christian Limpach" <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/8/06, Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> resend to larger group:
>
> which one is the right one?
> I'm going thru some merge hell and a need some newer PPC code from
> kernel.org.
> is it:
>    http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg (worked on)
This is the one which tracks the xen-unstable tree best, ideally on a
daily basis but sometimes I end up doing less boring things than
moving patches around. ;-)

> --or--
>    http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/linux-2.6-merge.hg (six weeks of
> nothing)
This is currently abandoned since it doesn't look like creating a
mergeable complete set of patches or tree has any chance of getting
merged upstream.  It is also very tedious to maintain because there
are usually many merge conflicts and/or manual intervention needed to
pull changes from linux-2.6-xen into this tree.

> there is also linux-2.6.rc-xen.hg
This is supposed to track xen-unstable fairly closely and also get
updated whenever there is a new linux rc version.

> linux-2.6.tip-xen.hg
This is supposed to track xen-unstable fairly closely and also get
updated to linux git tree on an almost daily basis.  Maintained by
Chris Wright.

> linux-2.6-patchqueue.hg
This is the patchqueue we intend to post on LKML.

> the PPC team depends on the xenolinux repos trees rather that the
> sparse tree.
> We were haning off linux-2.6-merge.hg we would like to figure out
> which one tracks Linus's git tree best.
Any of linux-2.6-xen, linux-2.6.rc-xen or linux-2.6.tip-xen, depending
on whether you like more churn coming from xen-unstable or from linux
git.

   christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel