WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-merge

[Xen-merge] proto_csum_valid/blank

To: <xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-merge] proto_csum_valid/blank
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:02:42 -0800
Delivery-date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 04:02:29 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-merge-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: xen-merge <xen-merge.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-merge@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-merge>, <mailto:xen-merge-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-merge>, <mailto:xen-merge-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-merge-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcXuUGuVnvIZcNOETJ68obUyQKm0Lw==
Thread-topic: proto_csum_valid/blank
Has there been any discussion with the linux community about
the addition of the two proto_csum_valid/blank bits to the
sk_buff structure?  If these are critical to the function of
the netback/netfront drivers, it might be worthwhile to start
that conversation.  (Just noticed these bits when
doing preliminary reconnaisance for the port of netif to ia64.)

Dan

_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-merge] proto_csum_valid/blank, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=