Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] necessary of `handling regNaT fault'

Hi all,

I'm not sure that the check is required, though, I think that the 
message is noisy.  So, I make a proposal that replaces the printk() 
by gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, ...).  What do you think?

Best regards,
 Kan

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:21:34 +0900 (JST), "KUWAMURA Shin'ya" wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Running i386 version LMbench on IA32-EL of dom0 generates many
>message outputs: # tens of lines per a second
>  (XEN) ia64_handle_reflection: handling regNaT fault
>
>Is the check required?
>
>I attached the patch that remove printk().
>
>How to reproduce:
>1. build LMbench on an i386 machine
>2. run par_mem on ia64
>   cd <LMbench directory>/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu
>   ./par_mem -L 128 -M 16M
>
>Best Regards,
>-- 
>  KUWAMURA Shin'ya
>
>-------------------------------text/plain-------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [IA64] Weekly benchmark results [ww15], KUWAMURA Shin'ya

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 2/3] [RESEND] ia64/pv_ops: preparation: introduce ia64_set_rr0_to_rr4() to make kernel paravirtualization friendly., Isaku Yamahata

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] necessary of `handling regNaT fault' message, KUWAMURA Shin'ya

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [RFC] necessary of `handling regNaT fault' message, Isaku Yamahata

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]