WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] linux: set memory attribute in inlineasm

Hi,

>On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 04:33:12PM +0200, tgingold@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> Selon Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 
>> > diff -r bb2f8ba47833 include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h
>> > --- a/include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h        Tue Mar 25 12:37:54 2008 -0600
>> > +++ b/include/asm-ia64/xen/privop.h        Sat Apr 05 07:27:30 2008 +0900
>> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
>> >  #endif
>> >
>> >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> > -#define   XEN_HYPER_SSM_I         asm("break %0" : : "i" 
(HYPERPRIVOP_SSM_I))
>> > +#define   XEN_HYPER_SSM_I         asm("break %0" : : "i" 
(HYPERPRIVOP_SSM_I):
>> > "memory")
>> >  #define   XEN_HYPER_GET_IVR       asm("break %0" : : "i" 
(HYPERPRIVOP_GET_IVR))
>> >
>> >  /************************************************/
>> >
>> > Shouldn't those be asm volatile, but asm?
>> 
>> IIRC, according to the gcc doc asm without outputs are volatile.
>
>Ah, right. From gcc info.
>> Assembler Instructions with C Expression Operands
>>  An `asm' instruction without any output operands will be treated
>> identically to a volatile `asm' instruction.
Thank you for your comments.
I also think it's right.
And I found XEN_HYPER_GET_IVR is wrong because it doesn't have return value.
But it is not used, so I just remove it.
I updated my patch.

Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe

Attachment: inline_asm_barrier.3.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel