WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: pv_ops polish: config option & head file

To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: pv_ops polish: config option & head file
From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:31:31 +0800
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 06:31:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1205812492.27908.31.camel@bling>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <7ktzjbqjfs.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080313124404.GA2687@saphi> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02E77732@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080314084609.GL22951%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02E777F6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1205514823.8100.30.camel@lappy> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02EBB71D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1205766861.7008.11.camel@lappy> <10EA09EFD8728347A513008B6B0DA77A02EBBC91@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1205812492.27908.31.camel@bling>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciIrHAHbq88YhZWTIi2aegQbezfeAAT83pA
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: pv_ops polish: config option & head file
Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 11:36 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>>> 
>>>    I think CONFIG_XEN might become something like
>>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XEN, which will be dependent on CONFIG_PARAVIRT. 
>>> There might also be CONFIG_PARAVIRT_LGUEST, CONFIG_PARAVIRT_KVM,
>>> etc...  I think that 
>> 
>> Then a single image won't be able to run on both lguest/Xen/KVM.
>> This is worse than running_on_xen dynamic condition check.
> 
>    Huh?  I never said you couldn't enable more than one
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT_FOO flavor in the same binary.
> 

How about just simply use CONFIG_PARAVIRT ?

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>