Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww50]

Hi Isaku,

On <20061219123144.GD22561%yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
 Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:10:16PM +0900, KUWAMURA Shin'ya wrote:
> 
> > I updated ltp's version to 20061121. Test cases marked with LTP's bug
> > disappeared, but two new cases (semget05 and semop04) failed.
> > 
> > Details:
> >   semget05    1  BROK  :  Unexpected signal 11 received.
> 
> This seems semget05 bug.

Thank you for your investigation. I will mark semget05 of LTP-20061121
with LTP's bug.

> >   semop04     1  BROK  :  couldn't create semaphore in setup
> >   semop04     2  BROK  :  Remaining cases broken
> 
> semop04 passes on my environment as follows
> Is this reproducable?

No, I cannot reproduce it. semop04 passed when I ran it again.
I have no idea why it failed.

Best Regards,
-- 
  KUWAMURA Shin'ya

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww50], KUWAMURA Shin'ya Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww50], Isaku Yamahata Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww50], KUWAMURA Shin'ya <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Follow new interrupt deliver mechanism for PV-on-HVM/IPF, DOI Tsunehisa

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about evtchn_callback reentry, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww50], Isaku Yamahata

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] use ia64_platform_is and do not init ns16550 on sn2, Jes Sorensen

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]