RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH]Complete fpswa handler retry mechanis

To:	"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH]Complete fpswa handler retry mechanism
From:	"Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:43:32 +0800
Cc:	xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:45:02 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcbgRx29LuOWa7YETj2ye7Opj07H6wAaT/Yw
Thread-topic:	[Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH]Complete fpswa handler retry mechanism

Hi Alex,

Thanks for your comment,
The purpose of changing IA64_RETRY is to avoid conflicting with
return value of handle_fpu_swa().
Attached is updated one.

Thanks,
Anthony

>Hi Anthony,
>
>   Why change IA64_RETRY to such an obscure value?  If it's necessary,
>please add a comment.  Thanks,
>
>       Alex
>
>--
>Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.

fpswa_retry.patch
Description: fpswa_retry.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel][PATCH]Complete fpswa handler retry mechanism