Hi, Isaku
Logically, it could be removed.
But I am not tested under your suggest configuration.
I will test on your configuration.
Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI
>On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 05:28:54PM +0900, Atsushi SAKAI wrote:
>
>> So this patch does not need to add vcpu_pend_timer fixes.
>
>O.K.
>So the modification of vcpu_pend_timer() is unnecessary for the patch.
>
>
>> But this should be fixed in sometime.
>
>Does you mean that the following hank is still needed?
>Why? What issue does the change resolve?
>
>@@ -1167,8 +1167,8 @@ void vcpu_pend_timer(VCPU *vcpu)
> * handler has not been registered. Don't fire in such case.
> */
> if (vcpu->virq_to_evtchn[VIRQ_ITC]) {
>+ PSCBX(vcpu, domain_itm_last) = PSCBX(vcpu, domain_itm);
> send_guest_vcpu_virq(vcpu, VIRQ_ITC);
>- PSCBX(vcpu, domain_itm_last) = PSCBX(vcpu, domain_itm);
> }
> } else
> vcpu_pend_interrupt(vcpu, itv);
>--
>yamahata
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home