WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-devel] PCI backend and slot functions

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] PCI backend and slot functions
From: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:12:04 +0200
Delivery-date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 06:07:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.5
Hi,

Currently PCI slot functions are not virtualized.  When I hide 0000:06:01.1 it 
appears as 0000:00:00.1 and there is no function 0 for the slot.  This is an 
issue because on linux/ia64, functions > 0 are not probed if there is no 
function 0.

How is it handled on x86 ?

Should I add an option to virtualize slot functions ?

Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel