RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831

["You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alex and all,

I used a wrong disk image to reproduce this issue. Sorry for the wrong 
information. But the nightly testing shows there are something wrong. I am 
redoing full testing to try again. 

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of You,
>Yongkang
>Sent: 2006年7月28日 13:20
>To: Alex Williamson
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831
>
>Yes. Xm list shows everything is right. But I can not connect to the 2nd one.
>Could you? :(
>
>Best Regards,
>Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006年7月28日 11:11
>>To: You, Yongkang
>>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#10831
>>
>>On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 10:59 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
>>> BTW, two XenU domain coexisting testing can pass in Changeset
>>10818:199d53efd029
>>
>>   Strange, I can run 2 domUs concurrently on 10831:
>>
>>Name                              ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State
>Time(s)
>>Domain-0                           0     2018     1 r-----   340.5
>>sarge1                             1     1024     1 r-----   214.8
>>sarge2                             2     2048     2 ------   143.9
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>      Alex
>>
>>--
>>Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux
>>Org.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel