WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Add IA64-specific cod

To: "Akio Takebe" <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH][QEMU] Add IA64-specific code for new qemu.
From: "Christian Limpach" <christian.limpach@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:41:56 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 05:42:32 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MgoTf1rbZQpT515FQoQ6S3yvWgnGHstEVpzszM/K3zrd4uVW+XVYQdDBEPaFWgDiQf/qhi9m4kACutgNfEAQ643Waz7o5Va+8TvOS2fe3p4bIRfqwT4odu7jOZ6hdbwvw/rtt3NxnN4jb+ZpIttSZOrXuS0ijvbP+C95t8H8Pb4=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <2FC6B0A5FE3BFEtakebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CA502B3E9EE27B4490C87C12E3C7C8510B25BF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2FC6B0A5FE3BFEtakebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Christian.Limpach@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 7/26/06, Akio Takebe <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, Xiantao

Is the following testandset redefine?

diff -r bbabdebc54ad tools/ioemu/exec-all.h
--- a/tools/ioemu/exec-all.h    Wed Jul 19 21:13:36 2006 +0100
+++ b/tools/ioemu/exec-all.h    Tue Jul 25 09:30:05 2006 +0800
@@ -391,6 +391,15 @@ static inline int testandset (int *p)
 }
 #endif

+#ifdef __ia64__
+#include "ia64_intrinsic.h"
+static inline int testandset (int *p)
+{
+    uint32_t o = 0, n = 1;
+    return (int)cmpxchg_acq(p, o, n);
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef __s390__
 static inline int testandset (int *p)
 {

I've merged it with the existing __ia64 case.

   christian

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel