 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Should we give up transparent virtualization ?
| To: | xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Should we give up transparent virtualization ? |
| From: | Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 17:18:55 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 30 May 2006 08:14:43 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.5 |
Hi, most big recent patches (dom0vp, event channel) have broken transparent virtualization. Should we give up this feature ? If only Dan and I like this feature, this question should be clearly asked. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: adding a dom0_firmware_setup hypercall, Tristan Gingold |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] preparation for vga acceleration of VTI domain, Tian, Kevin |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] clean up ia64 xen-mkbuildtree-pre, Isaku Yamahata |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Should we give up transparent virtualization ?, Alex Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
