|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code
Hi Anthony,
A few comments.
On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 20:02 +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
> @@ -321,88 +285,82 @@ ENTRY(vmx_alt_itlb_miss)
> - ;;
> - mov cr.itir=r20
> - ;;
> - srlz.i
> - ;;
> - itc.i r19 // insert the TLB entry
...
> + ;;
> + mov cr.itir=r20
> + itc.i r19 // insert the TLB entry
...
> - ;;
> - mov cr.itir=r20
> - ;;
> - srlz.i
> - ;;
> -(p7) itc.d r19 // insert the TLB entry
...
> + ;;
> + mov cr.itir=r20
> +(p7)itc.d r19 // insert the TLB entry
The loss of serialization between mv cr.itir and itc has me nervous.
The assembler is nervous about it too:
Warning: Use of 'itc.i' violates RAW dependency 'CR[ITIR]' (implied)
Warning: Use of 'itc.d' may violate RAW dependency 'CR[ITIR]' (implied)
Also, this patch has gotten very large, and I'm not sure it only
includes cleanups anymore. There seems to be lots of new code mixed in
as well. Could you separate simple formatting cleanup from code
restructuring and modification? I did verify that this version of the
patch allows me to to boot domVTI again. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, You, Yongkang
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code,
Alex Williamson <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND]clean up vti code, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|
|
|