Hi, Alex,
I've reproduced your observation at 8th wget for a 670MB image, and
now is looking into it.
Thanks,
Kevin
>From: Tian, Kevin
>Sent: 2006年5月25日 10:36
>>From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006年5月25日 10:26
>>
>>On Thu, 2006-05-25 at 10:04 +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>
>>> VTI network has not been tested aggressively and thus your
>>observation
>>> is new and we'll take a look.
>>>
>>> I'll try again by following your steps. As a confirmation required from
>>you:
>>> - Simple dom0+domVTI can trigger the block issue. DomU can
>>> accelerate
>>
>>Correct
>>
>>> - dom0 and domVTI are running on different processors.
>>
>>Correct, I disabled threads and had dom0 running on cpu0 and domVTI
>>running on cpu3 (w/ affinity of any cpu. ie it was the default
>>placement)
>>> - can that happen steadily? If not, how about the frequency.
>>
>>Yes, happened every time I exercised domVTI.
>>
>>> - which test case do you propose to try? 'wget' or KB. Previously I
>>> always try with wget.
>>
>>wget hit it much faster, within a few tries pulling a 512MB file. The
>>kernel build ran for maybe 30 minutes (very roughly). Thanks,
>>
>> Alex
>>
>
>OK, previous my test is based on a 128MB file, but that shouldn't matter
>since both copied to /dev/null. Anyway, I'll create a bigger file to see
>whether to reproduce.
>
>Thanks,
>Kevin
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|