RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question about evtchn_vector

To:	"Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question about evtchn_vector
From:	"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 10 May 2006 10:57:38 +0800
Delivery-date:	Tue, 09 May 2006 19:58:13 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcZze+TAnu4t/rOUSRafU4FzdowyPQAYEUgg
Thread-topic:	[Xen-ia64-devel] Question about evtchn_vector

>From:Tristan Gingold
>Sent: 2006年5月9日 23:22
>
>Hi,
>
>currently evtchn_vector is a field of vcpu_info.  I think it should be a field
>of shared_info, because it is shared by every processor.
>Comment ?
>
>Tristan.
>

Yes, that vector is domain-wise. However do you really need put it 
into shared_info? Guest doesn't access this field directly, and how 
about moving it into arch_domain?

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Question about evtchn_vector