[Xen-ia64-devel] Surprsing cyclesoak result in Xen0 !!

To:	<xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-ia64-devel] Surprsing cyclesoak result in Xen0 !!
From:	"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 14 Apr 2006 11:56:08 +0800
Delivery-date:	Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:06:15 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcZfd1xDg8AmDGn+Q4W+mu9IY/jzOA==
Thread-topic:	Surprsing cyclesoak result in Xen0 !!

Hi all,
        I have run cyclesoak in native and xen0 environment, but got a
surprising result. When configure same environment (1 CPU and 1G mem)
between native and xen0, the loops/sec of xen0 is twice higher than
native. In addition, I saw bogomips value in xen0 is also twice higher
than native.

Fujitsu guys, Could you confirm me?

Thanks
-Xiantao

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] Surprsing cyclesoak result in Xen0 !!