xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb
Hi Alex,
Below data is got based on changeset 8489.
System:
Tiger 4
4G RAM (2GB available to xen)
Montecito 1.4GHz dual core dual thread.
DomU 512M RAM
bare metal (UP):
Total TimeBuild Time 2 Build Time 1
=====================================================================
4008 Second 2004 Second 1995 Second
=====================================================================
domU w/o hash vtlb
Total TimeBuild Time 2 Build Time 1
=====================================================================
3966 Second 1976 Second 1978 Second
=====================================================================
domU w/ hash vtlb
Total Time Build Time1 Build Time2
=====================================================================
3959 Second 1970 Second 1975 Second
=====================================================================
DomU can still get better performance after applying hash_vtlb patch.
This performance gain is based on 2% degradation of Dom0.(I don't get
performance
data on Dom0 this time)
The attachment is the script which I used to get kernel build performance.
Usage Example,
./make_kernel.sh 2 /root/linux-2.6.16.tar.bz2
(times of build) (absolute path)
>From: Alex Williamson
>Sent: 2006?4?10? 13:10
>Hi Anthony,
>
> Thanks, I applied all the patches to my test tree and am able to
>boot. However, I'm not able to reproduce the performance increase for
>domU. I see a performance decrease across the board (including a
>significant increase in system time). Here are my results:
>
>System:
> HP zx6000
> 10GB RAM (7GB available to xen using max_addr=10G)
> 2x1.3GHz Mad6M
>
>(results below are the best time from 2 runs)
>
>bare metal (UP):
> 1829s (56.6s system) baseline
>
>dom0 w/o hash vtlb:
> 1928s (64.4s system) +5.4% (+13.7% system)
>
>domU w/o hash vtlb
> 1877s (63.8s system) +2.6% (+12.7% system)
>
>dom0 w/ hash vtlb
> 1986s (86.3s system) +8.6% (+52.5% system)
>
>domU w/ hash vtlb
> 1932s (84.2s system) +5.6% (+48.8% system)
>
>Is the performance increase reproducible on your system? Can you
>provide the system specs? Can anyone else verify performance with and
>without this patch set on their system? Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>--
>Alex Williamson HP Linux & Open Source Lab
Deleted Attachment.txt
Description: Deleted Attachment.txt
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Tristan Gingold
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb,
Xu, Anthony <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, You, Yongkang
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|