WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb

To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 22:07:03 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 07:07:40 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance: normal
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Priority: normal
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZcXTRVhw5xRYIbRDCN2tvx7vJz/wASGCCw
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] [Resend]Enable hash vtlb
Hi Alex,

Below data is got based on changeset 8489.

System:
        Tiger 4
        4G RAM (2GB available to xen)
        Montecito 1.4GHz dual core dual thread.
        DomU 512M RAM

bare metal (UP):
Total TimeBuild Time 2  Build Time 1
=====================================================================
4008 Second  2004 Second  1995 Second
=====================================================================

domU w/o hash vtlb
Total TimeBuild Time 2  Build Time 1  
=====================================================================
3966 Second  1976 Second  1978 Second  
=====================================================================

domU w/ hash vtlb
Total Time      Build Time1  Build Time2
=====================================================================
3959 Second  1970 Second  1975 Second  
=====================================================================


DomU can still get better performance after applying hash_vtlb patch.
This performance gain is based on 2% degradation of Dom0.(I don't get 
performance
data on Dom0 this time)

The attachment is the script which I used to get kernel build performance.
Usage Example,
./make_kernel.sh    2    /root/linux-2.6.16.tar.bz2
                  (times of build)   (absolute path)  


>From: Alex Williamson 
>Sent: 2006?4?10? 13:10
>Hi Anthony,
>
>   Thanks, I applied all the patches to my test tree and am able to
>boot.  However, I'm not able to reproduce the performance increase for
>domU.  I see a performance decrease across the board (including a
>significant increase in system time).  Here are my results:
>
>System:
>   HP zx6000
>   10GB RAM (7GB available to xen using max_addr=10G)
>   2x1.3GHz Mad6M
>
>(results below are the best time from 2 runs)
>
>bare metal (UP):
>   1829s (56.6s system) baseline
>
>dom0 w/o hash vtlb:
>   1928s (64.4s system) +5.4% (+13.7% system)
>
>domU w/o hash vtlb
>   1877s (63.8s system) +2.6% (+12.7% system)
>
>dom0 w/ hash vtlb
>   1986s (86.3s system) +8.6% (+52.5% system)
>
>domU w/ hash vtlb
>   1932s (84.2s system) +5.6% (+48.8% system)
>
>Is the performance increase reproducible on your system?  Can you
>provide the system specs?  Can anyone else verify performance with and
>without this patch set on their system?  Thanks,
>
>       Alex
>
>--
>Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab

Attachment: Deleted Attachment.txt
Description: Deleted Attachment.txt

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>