|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb 
| >Could be, but your numbers raise questions about your
>measurement methodology.  Why
>is domU faster than native (with or without the patch)?
Didn't you know kernel build on DomU is faster than native?
I remember Fujitsu has post this kind of data, and I also got
this kind of data from Intel QA team.
I have suspected this data too.
After further thought, I think the main reason is 
the services running on domU is less than those on native machine, 
for example, all network-related services are not running on domU.
You can get this kind of data yourself. :-)
Thanks,
Anthony
>And why is domU much faster than the previous numbers
>you posted for dom0 (with or without the patch)?
>I've never seen either of these to be true.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Yang, Fred
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Xu, Anthony
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb,
Xu, Anthony <=
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Enable hash vtlb, Yang, Fred
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |