|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix
Ah but with further examination, I see that setting
the bits to zero will avoid problems, so I agree
now that the patch is good.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:45 AM
> To: 'Xu, Anthony'; xen-ia64-devel
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix
>
> I am reading from an old SDM so this may have changed,
> but I think the low two bits of cr.itir are NOT reserved,
> so it is not necessary to write zero to them.
>
> See SDM Vol2 3.3.5.5
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of Xu, Anthony
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:42 AM
> > To: xen-ia64-devel
> > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix
> >
> > Before injecting fault to guest, VMM need to setup
> > guest itir by using guest region register.
> > But the lowest two bits of itir are reserved. VMM need
> > to reset these two bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony Xu <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Anthony
> >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] access_reflection fix, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|
|
|