RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction

["You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>]

Masaki, 

Your patch is really important and great helpful! Needn't sorry. ;)
I am playing some auto testing to try to give more accurate result in time. 

I also found another similar bug before that patch. If I create 1 xenU and 1 
VTI, destroying xenU will cause the whole system hang. 

Best Regards,
Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Masaki Kanno [mailto:kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年3月23日 15:29
>To: You, Yongkang
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction
>
>Hi Yongkang,
>
>I'm sorry. I was hasty. I carried out a test to repeat that
>created/destroyed only one VTI domain. I don't know the
>cause why a system was hung up.
>
>Best regards,
> Kan
>
>You, Yongkang wrote:
>>Hi Masaki,
>>
>>It is a great patch! I have tried the latest Cset about the destroying VTI
>Domain. But a bug induced in. :)
>>
>>If 1 VTI domain, it is okay. But if 2 VTI domain is created, destroy 1 VTI 
>>will
>hang whole system.
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>Yongkang (Kangkang) 喟慎
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>Masaki
>>>Kanno
>>>Sent: 2006定3??22?? 20:24
>>>To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fixed VTI domain destruction
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>This patch fixed the VTI domain destruction processing.
>>>I tested creation/destruction domU. The "domU" which I tested is
>>>VTI domain and non VTI domain. There was not the memory leak
>>>issue, and VTI domain is not left in a zombie state.
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by: Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>Best regards,
>>> Kan
>>

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel