WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] update linux kernels w/ xen-ia64 cset 9275

To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>, "You, Yongkang" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] update linux kernels w/ xen-ia64 cset 9275
From: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:34:31 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:35:28 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcZJaefUcPTlbvsKTYepyYYtMhAXAwAAPJtw
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] update linux kernels w/ xen-ia64 cset 9275
Alex/ Tristan

Legacy privifiedinsns is being used; please turn on it by default.
Pls refer to the attachment.

Thanks,
-Anthony 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alex
>Williamson
>Sent: 2006年3月17日 10:24
>To: You, Yongkang
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] update linux kernels w/ xen-ia64 cset 9275
>
>On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 09:52 +0800, You, Yongkang wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> I am not very clear about the "new Xen image" and the "old xenlinux
>> kernel" standard for. Does xenlinux kernel mean xenU kernel?
>
>   Sorry for being unclear.  Tristan's latest changes disable privop
>handling, requiring xen.gz and dom0 and domU kernels to be updated in
>parallel.  Just be sure to do a make world and update all these at once
>and you shouldn't hit any problems.  Thanks,
>
>       Alex
>--
>Alex Williamson                             HP Linux & Open Source Lab
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
--- Begin Message ---
To: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e
From: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:16:00 +0800
Cc: <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcZEJlSU6T2R5rRGTu+t+ruWjttWOgAOn0PwALM7FnAAEu/a0A==
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel]Question about priv_ptc_e
> >There are several of these that need to be changed,
> >so let's change all of them the same way at the same time.
> 
> It is still being used.
> At least, Dom0 uses pte.e to emulate fc.
> GLOBAL_ENTRY(xen_fc)
>     261     movl r8=running_on_xen;;
>     262     ld4 r8=[r8];;
>     263     cmp.eq p7,p0=r8,r0;;
>     264 (p7)    fc r32;;
>     265 (p7)    br.ret.sptk.many rp
>     266     ;;
>     267     ptc.e r96       // this is a "privified" fc r32
>     268     ;;
>     269     br.ret.sptk.many rp
>     270 END(xen_fc)

Good catch.  In fact, there are uses of this for several
instructions still in xenlinux/ia64.  Grep -sparse
for "privif" to see all(?) of them.  I think these never
got translated to HYPERPRIVOPs because there was no
performance need.  But they should be fixed to avoid
the possibility of a bug.



--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel