WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [2/3rd week]

To: "Akio Takebe" <takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "yo.fujita" <yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [2/3rd week]
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 22:13:39 -0800
Delivery-date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 06:13:55 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcY3n129nKf36CUlTSuTxH69qISx2wAoCUSA
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [2/3rd week]
Note that the cset numbers are different between xen-ia64-unstable.hg
and xen-unstable.hg.  After looking at both, I think you are
using xen-ia64-unstable.hg cset numbers and I was using xen-unstable.hg
cset numbers.

My previous failure with 8717 must have been an unrelated
problem (possibly pilot error :-).  Xen-unstable cset 8782
is successful for me.  I am now trying cset xen-unstable 8783
but will probably not see results until the morning.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 3:59 AM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); yo.fujita; 
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Akio Takebe
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [2/3rd week]
> 
> Hi, Dan
> 
> I tried on cset 8900.
> Now I'm making the new patch to solve the following problem.
> But my problem may be different from your one.
> (Because I could boot domU by using cset 8774)
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Akio Takebe
> 
> >Does your patch work for you on tip?  I tried it on tip and
> >got the same error (Hotplug scripts not working).  I did
> >not try it (yet) on cset 8789/8790.
> >
> >Dan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:41 PM
> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); yo.fujita; 
> >> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [2/3rd week]
> >> 
> >> Hi, Dan, Alex, all
> >> 
> >> I tried udev-0.85 but it failed.
> >> 
> >> >Cset 8604 seems to work for me.  Tip fails and cset 8717
> >> >fails.
> >> Really?
> >> I think that cset 8790 patch is a cause. 
> >> I can boot domU by using cset 8789.
> >> I'm trying to debug it.
> >> 
> >> I can boot domU by using the following patch.
> >> 
> >> diff -r ded14681ae84 tools/xenstore/xenstored_domain.c
> >> --- a/tools/xenstore/xenstored_domain.c Sat Feb 18 
> 13:17:24 2006 -0700
> >> +++ b/tools/xenstore/xenstored_domain.c Wed Feb 22 
> 06:00:49 2006 +0900
> >> @@ -500,6 +500,7 @@ static int dom0_init(void)
> >>         if (fd == -1)
> >>                 return -1;
> >>  
> >> +       kva=(0x0fffffffffffffff & kva) ;
> >>         dom0->interface = mmap(NULL, getpagesize(), 
> >> PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
> >>                                MAP_SHARED, fd, kva);
> >>         if (dom0->interface == MAP_FAILED)
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Please advice to me.
> >> 
> >> Best Regards,
> >> 
> >> Akio Takebe
> >> 
> >> >After more investigation, this may not be related
> >> >to a newer hotplug/udev.
> >> >
> >> >Fujita --
> >> >
> >> >Have you been able to get this to work on RH4?
> >> >
> >> >Everyone --
> >> >
> >> >Is anybody else seeing this problem?  It seems to
> >> >occur starting domU on RH4 (but not on Debian).  The
> >> >symptom is that when "xm create" is executed, the
> >> >result is:
> >> >
> >> >Error: Device 769 (vbd) could not be connected.  Hotplug 
> scripts not
> >> >working.
> >> >
> >> >Cset 8604 seems to work for me.  Tip fails and cset 8717
> >> >fails.
> >> >
> >> >If anyone is successfully booting a domU on a clean install of
> >> >tip on RH4, please respond.
> >> >
> >> >Dan
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) 
> >> >> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:52 AM
> >> >> To: 'yo.fujita'; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results 
> [2/3rd week]
> >> >> 
> >> >> Hi Fujita --
> >> >> 
> >> >> Some recent change in the xen-unstable tree apparently
> >> >> requires an updated hotplug/udev installed in domain0.
> >> >> We are trying to understand how to fix this.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Dan 
> >> >> 
> >> >> > -----Original Message-----
> >> >> > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >> >> > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf 
> >> >> > Of yo.fujita
> >> >> > Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 12:42 AM
> >> >> > To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results 
> [2/3rd week]
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Hi,
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > I tried Xen build by the last changeset of 2/15(Cs: 
> >> >> > 8828:982b9678af2c).
> >> >> > Then, when "Xend start" was done by the host machine, the 
> >> >> > keyboard did hang.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > In addition, domU not Boot.
> >> >> > Please look at the attached file. Its "xm create" log.
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > TEST ENVIRONMENT
> >> >> >     Machine          : Tiger4
> >> >> >     changeset        : 8828:982b9678af2c
> >> >> >     Dom0 OS          : RHEL4 U2 (no SMP)
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> > Fujita
> >> >> > 
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>