Hi Dan, Yongkang,
> Could you share information with each other about what
> LTP tests are passing and failing?
Yes, I think that it is very important.
I match it with a version of his LTP to share information
with Yongkang.
However, because my information is on domU, the result might be
different from Yongkang.
> I think it is important to have the weekly testing
> but I think that if a test fails on native Linux/ia64,
> we should not consider it as a failure on Xen/ia64.
In my case, LTP on native linux is all success.
Thanks,
Fujita
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
[mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 9:37 AM
> To: You, Yongkang; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yo.fujita
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in
IA64/Xen0
> with1700+ cases until now.
>
> Yongkang and Fujita --
>
> Could you share information with each other about what
> LTP tests are passing and failing? I think it is important
> to have the weekly testing but I think that if a test
> fails on native Linux/ia64, we should not consider it
> as a failure on Xen/ia64.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> > Of You, Yongkang
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 4:45 PM
> > To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] I found 4 exact LTP cases failed in
> > IA64/Xen0 with1700+ cases until now.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is a resend email, because the last email is too large
> > to reach the Mailing list. :)
> >
> > I have reported 4 cases failed or crashed in the past several
> > days. Now I have finished a fuller LTP testing, which
> > executed 1700+ cases (there are some duplicated cases).
> > Excluding the cases that are failed on Native Linux too, I
> > only caught 4 special failed cases, which I have reported yet.
> >
> > Now I have a brief summary:
> > ======Test environment=====
> > Xen0: RHEL4u2
> > Xen Source: xen-ia64-unstable 8481
> > LTP Source: 2005-12-5
> > ========================
> >
> > The following testcases do Not pass:
> > FAIL ltp:syscalls Case alarm04
> > FAIL ltp:math float_exp_log
> > FAIL ltp:math float_power
> > CRASH ltp:crashme crash01
> >
> > The following is only the summary of testing result. It is
> > automatically counted by LTP script. So the total failed case
> > number can't show the real IA64 Xen0 status. The exact failed
> > cases have been listed above.
> >
> > Summary Test Report of Last Session
> > =============================================================
> > = Total Pass Fail NoResult Crash
> > =============================================================
> > =ltp 1739 1692 46 0 1
> > stress_part2 22 20 2 0 0
> > mm 21 21 0 0 0
> > nptl 1 1 0 0 0
> > multicast 4 1 3 0 0
> > commands 11 8 3 0 0
> > pty 3 3 0 0 0
> > pipes 6 6 0 0 0
> > network_comman 7 6 1 0 0
> > quickhit 121 121 0 0 0
> > sched 3 3 0 0 0
> > fs 54 54 0 0 0
> > syscalls 685 684 1 0 0
> > admin_tools 8 7 1 0 0
> > dio 28 28 0 0 0
> > fsx 1 0 1 0 0
> > ipc 8 8 0 0 0
> > math 10 8 2 0 0
> > ltplite 320 315 5 0 0
> > stress_part1 127 102 25 0 0
> > crashme 1 0 0 0 1
> > stress_part3 298 296 2 0 0
> > =============================================================
> > =Total 1739 1692 46 0 1
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> > Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> >
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home