WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address: a000f00100cf0000

To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] vcpu_translate: bad physical address: a000f00100cf0000
From: Matthew Chapman <matthewc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:33:05 +1100
Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:40:41 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
The current Xen/ia64 tree doesn't work for me, Dom0 dies here:

Memory: 491056k/523264k available (11335k code, 31600k reserved, 4831k data, 
304k init)
(XEN) vcpu_translate: bad physical address: a000f00100cf0000 @ a0000001000080d0 
(kr7=000000000ccec000)
[machine check]

The erroneous fault is in vhpt_miss while handling a region 5
miss (the first, from ia64_patch_gate).  The address comes from:

  LOAD_PHYSICAL(p6, r19, swapper_pg_dir)

which is a movl which is patched into a physical address by
ia64_patch_vtop.

The unpatched value is 0xa000000100cf0000, and it should have
been patched to 0xccf0000.  Having added some debug output to
ia64_patch_imm64, it seems that tpa produces the right value, and
it tries to patch it.

However, something obviously goes wrong, since the address above
is neither the unpatched address nor the intended physical
address.

Anyone seen this before?

Matt


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>