|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH for warnings; was "-Wall" option doesn't work
To: |
"Tristan Gingold" <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH for warnings; was "-Wall" option doesn't work |
From: |
"Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:41:15 -0800 |
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:47:45 +0000 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcYXZeoobaS+gWi6QCyYCae6zkpD+gAa33KQ |
Thread-topic: |
PATCH for warnings; was "-Wall" option doesn't work |
I tested this patch and was about to commit it but noticed
that there was no "Signed-off-by" line. In support of
Kevin's message the other day and Xen patch standards,
could I ask you to please resend the patch with a valid
"Signed-off-by" line? If there are no other changes in
the patch file, I will commit it without further testing.
Thanks,
Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:53 AM
> To: Tian, Kevin; Xu, Anthony;
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs
> Fort Collins)
> Subject: PATCH for warnings; was "-Wall" option doesn't work
>
> Le Jeudi 12 Janvier 2006 09:44, Tian, Kevin a écrit :
> > I think above patches to fix warning are very important
> and always
> > welcomed for stability. Maybe Dan was in busy with other
> more important
> > threads at time you sent out them. Could you re-send them out?
> >
> > >For sure, fixing warnings is *very* boring. Some are in fact bugs:
> > > function called with less arguments, very dubious casts...
> > >I really think warnings must be enabled and the earlier is
> the better.
> > >
> > >Tristan.
> >
> > Absolutely agree.
> Hi,
>
> here is the (small) patch which enable warnings and fixes
> those which occurs
> in every file.
> This is really a minimal patch. I think this is a good start point.
>
> Tristan.
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: PATCH for warnings; was "-Wall" option doesn't work,
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=
|
|
|
|
|