WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Suggest to use Signed-off-by when sending patch

To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Suggest to use Signed-off-by when sending patch
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:55:49 -0800
Cc: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:01:53 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYUxvb4ibF9yccVSsW5UGO4jdH0+gACUZUg
Thread-topic: Suggest to use Signed-off-by when sending patch
Thanks very much Kevin!

One comment:  When submitting patches to Xen, the Signed-off-by
line says that you as the developer are certifying a number of things.
Please ensure that you understand and that your company agrees with:

http://www.osdl.org/newsroom/press_releases/2004/2004_05_24_dco.html 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:47 PM
> To: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Keir Fraser
> Subject: Suggest to use Signed-off-by when sending patch
> 
> Now many developers are active and making great contribution 
> on this mailing list.  After discussing with Dan, we suggest 
> everyone to use Signed-off-by when sending out your patch and 
> especially with a brief description within your patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by is introduced by Linus to track who makes the 
> patch originally and the path that patch gets 
> reviewed/changed, and thus it's also generally required in 
> xen community. It's easy to note that all xen branches 
> (except xen-ia64-unstable) conform to this style. Since this 
> sign is an indicator to the originator, Dan won't help add it 
> if missing and will ask for resubmission later. Also, this is 
> the sign to preserve your credit for effort on this patch. ;-)
> 
> Most time the content in the mail body is verbose for 
> background / description / discussion / etc. which will take 
> Dan's extra time to summarize. So a short/precise description 
> about the patch is better to be added into the patch together 
> with the Signed-off-by. Usually if you work on hg repository, 
> it's easy since you are requested to input description when 
> commit the patch and then later "hg export" can generate 
> exact style here. If you generate the patch by yourself with 
> "diff" directly, it's also easy to use vi after creating 
> patch to add the description info.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> Kevin
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: Suggest to use Signed-off-by when sending patch, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) <=